Phoenix DUI Lawyers

When you are accused of a crime you face the possibility of severe consequences and the damaging effects of a maligned name. While the criminally accused are presumed innocent until confirmed guilty and have numerous rights guaranteed them under the U.S Constitution, these rights might be overlooked if you are not aware of them. Therefore, it is important that you contact a Phoenix criminal defense attorney when you learn of your charges to make certain that your rights are protected.

“This firm represents customers arrested at the I-eight immigration check point near Yuma, Arizona. These customers are commonly charged with Possession of Marijuana/attempt and possession of drug paraphernalia/try. Last week alone we got seven of these circumstances dismissed. That suggests no convictions on these clients records. (Wellton Justice Court, Wellton, Arizona)”

In addition to having an attorney that will defend your rights, you require an attorney with experience in criminal defense that knows the law nicely and will defend your innocence with skill. An accomplished defense attorney is vital, particularly if you are facing severe criminal charges exactly where your simple freedoms are at stake.

When your innocence in a criminal matter is referred to as into question it is crucial that you seek the counsel of a criminal defense attorney. Police officers and prosecutors are not obligated to act in your most beneficial interest; therefore, it is essential that you get in touch with an attorney quickly right after you are aware of your charges. Our Phoenix criminal defense attorneys will battle for your rights and be the legal advocate you will need. The criminal defense attorneys at Cates, Hanson, Sargeant & Schoenau, PLC are devoted to protecting your rights and defending you against the criminal charges that you face.

Contact an Arizona Criminal Lawyer at 1-877-229-9508 to schedule a free initial consultation.

At Cates, Hanson, Sargeant & Schoenau, PLC, we have the encounter, expertise and resources to support you battle the charges that you face. We aggressively defend the rights of those accused of all severe crimes, such as drug crimes, aggravated assault, kidnapping, drive-by-shootings, robbery, murder/homicide, sex crimes, immigration checkpoint violations and domestic violence.

If you face criminal charges, contact the Arizona Criminal Lawyer of Cates, Hanson, Sargeant & Schoenau, PLC at 602-296-3434 to speak directly with a Arizona criminal lawyer who can aid you understand the charges that you face and guard your rights.

Follow this link for recent Arizona criminal lawyer

Originally published here.

Drinking and driving is not only illegal, but it is dangerous and can result in the loss of lives, even your own. Because of their public visibility, there have been a number of celebrities who have been in the news for being arrested for a DUI. (Driving Under the Influence) Below is a list of celebrities who have been arrested for DUI:

Richie Sambora: Bon Jovi guitarist, Richie Sambora, was arrested for drunk driving in Laguna Beach, California on March 25 2008. His BAC was reportedly .13%. His daughter and another child were in the car at the time of the arrest. Sambora and Prosecutors made a deal that called for Sambora to plead no contest to driving with blood alcohol content above the legal limit. In exchange the district attorney dropped the more serious charge of California DUI. Sambora also was ordered to complete a three month alcohol awareness class and pay court fees.

Stephanie Pratt: One of the star’s of the MTV reality show, ‘The Hills,’ Stephanie Pratt was arrested for driving under the influence in Los Angeles on October 18, 2009. She was pulled over in Hollywood about 3:45 am and booked for suspicion of California DUI. She posted $5000 bond and was released on Sunday.

Charles Barkley: Former NBA player Charles Barkley was arrested for DUI in Gilbert Arizona on December 31, 2008. Barkley was stopped by police for running a red light in Old Town Scottsdale. His blood alcohol content was reportedly .149%. Barkley pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 10 days in jail; however, five of those days will be suspended if Barkley completes an alcohol treatment program. He was also fined more than $2,000. Barkley was a member of the Phoenix Suns in the NBA and is at present, a sports analyst for TNT.

Chad Kroeger: Nickelback band lead singer Chad Kroeger was arrested in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada in June 2006 for DUI. Kroeger was stopped for speeding in his Lamborghini. The officers detected alcohol and administered a breathalyzer test. Kroger’s blood alcohol level registered .14% and he was charged with drunk driving. He lost his driver’s license for one year and was fined $590.

Mel Gibson: On July 28, 2006, actor and film producer Mel Gibson was arrested in Malibu California for driving under the influence. Gibson entered a no contest plea to the CA DUI charges. He was sentenced to three years probation and fined $1,300. He also had his license suspended for 90 days and was ordered to enroll in an alcohol abuse program and attend Alcoholic Anonymous meetings.

Khloe Kardashian: Reality television show star Khloe Kardashian, star of ‘Keeping up with the Kardashians,’ was arrested in 2007 for driving under the influence in California. Kardashian was sentenced to 36 months of probation and was required to complete community service and attend alcohol education classes. Because she failed to do both, Kardashian was sentenced to 30 days in jail, but only spent five hours incarcerated due to overcrowding in the jail. Khloe Kardashian was also on the television show, ‘The Celebrity Apprentice.’

It is important not to follow the example of celebrities who drink and drive. You could receive a big fine, lose, your license, and possibly go to jail. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Traffic Safety Data, “In 2008, an estimated 11,773 people died in drunken driving related crashes.”

Originally published here.

An analysis of public information and education activity: Section two analytic study VII